AI

 I have described myself as AI skeptical. That was because I knew and felt the same frustration most people have had

 with AI, and yet I also see the potential.

I have long thought that computers and humans were... complementary. They're better at certain things than we are, we're better at other things, and I frankly look forward to dumping all the tedious, mind-numbing and boring work on artificial intelligence. 

At the same time, the term 'meatspace' has become common for good reason.

If you're using AI to read e-mails and articles, and then using AI to write a response, and all you're really doing is sitting at the keyboard as a meatsuit for the AI... what are you even doing here?

And don't get me started how tech companies have pushed AI on us. Foisted it. It's one thing to have a nice little icon on the menu bar letting you know it's an option. It's another thing to rearrange your entire website so that the only think you see is an AI prompt window. 

But that's all casual observation, as a customer or user and not as a coder or programmer. 

Ever since my company purchased a subscription to one of the major AI coding platforms, and I realized that (as we lost a team member, and there's only one other member of my team stateside at the moment) I needed someone or something to answer questions and help me resolve issues while I learn my job, I have been using it at work.

And...

It's been a bit like the Gartner Hype cycle, all happening in about a month.

It's a powerful tool. A really powerful tool. But it will also go off on wild goose chases and tangents unless I stop it.

I've also worked hard at creating a 'coding harness', though I didn't even really understand that term when I started. I just knew that I wanted it to remember important parts about how our self-service application worked, and that I didn't want it to keep all that information in it's context window if it wasn't relevant. So I had it create a 'lessons learned' document, and reference documents, and also added in some hooks and workflows to try to make it consistently perform well and not hallucinate or write some crappy slop.

I... am not sure about that last part. I am still learning our application myself, and it's been great at helping explain what the code is doing and how it's doing it, but when you have multiple steps in a flow where one function is calling another function which is calling yet another, I am not entirely sure the AI understands the full flow properly. But that's what code reviews are for, right?

Anyways, in terms of troubleshooting, it's really, really good. Almost scary good. I had it create a skill so it knew what logs to check to see how a request was handled (this took some work too, because I gave it about four examples of different types of requests and had it look for the log entries related to it... and at first it was like "I didn't find any results, expanding the search window from the last 30 days to the last 60 days" and I had to stop it very fast and point out that the examples I gave were all from the last couple of days. Basically if it's not finding results with it's query, the issue is with the query and not with the date-range.)

Anyways, once I got it all configured it proved it's worth. It actually proved it's worth while I was configuring it, as a help request came in while I was training it and I decided to use that as an example. It very quickly noticed that the reason our company's customer support person wasn't able to get an account on their client's instance for troubleshooting purposes was because the group we were trying to create their account in had another group with the exact same name in it, and the duplicate names meant it was erroring out.

The skill has been... a life-saver, tbh. It's helped identify root causes and find workarounds more than I want to admit.

However - it still needs human judgment.  Human involvement. If it starts going down the wrong track it just keeps on going. 

It reminds me a bit of Mickey Mouse as the Sorceror's Apprentice in Fantasia, when he got the broom to start carrying the buckets of water. Except that things soon got out of hand, the brooms multiplied and kept carrying water and kept carrying water and kept carrying water...

Because here's the thing.

A human would eventually notice that the water was overflowing, that continuing to bring buckets of water didn't make sense, and they would probably stop before things got out of hand. They'd at least ask you if you really wanted them to keep doing it.

That broom, however, did not.

And an AI will not. Not unless on some level it's programmed to.

Anyways, as I see the discussions of AI going around and look at what tech companies are doing and consider it's usefulness and it's challenges, I think the heart of the problem is this:

Some people are using AI as a replacement for real people. 

And that, at least at our current level of technology, is going to fail. 

Update

 It's been a while since I sat and typed out some long posts. I've mostly just been throwing in some quick links for articles that interested me.

I don't think I've really talked about my thoughts on AI since I started using it at work, for example. And of course I'll have to write something about current events.

But overall - things are going well. I still love my job, am still working remote, and if it weren't for the ongoing decline in *looks around and skims the news* pretty much everything else, I'd say things were going well.

Oh, and I might have a business trip to Poland soon. I haven't been to Poland yet, so I'm looking forward to it. 

Weeds

If you plant a garden and then say 'I'm not going to remove anything or water or prune because I believe in survival of the fittest'

you will soon find yourself growing weeds.

Predictably Irrational

A conversation a few weeks ago convinced me to pick up Predictably Irrational. It fits rather well with things I already knew, and definitely goes far beyond. 

I was reading the chapter on market norms vs social norms, basically pointing out that people act differently depending on which set of norms are in play. We don't charge friends for moving their couch, for example. And we don't work for free.

The examples he used also show another norm. Something I thought pretty obvious, but hard-hearted business leaders seem to forget - when market norms are in play, the quality and quantity of work depend on how much you're compensated for it. (This is also probably why they try to shift the situation to a social norm, by building a sense of community, etc - but given they don't actually act like a family since everyone knows they will fire you in a heartbeat, going beyond the typical office norms just seems pretty fake.)

Cheap out and pay people poorly, and you get what you paid for - a bare minimum of effort.

Too True

It's from a fictional story, but I think it applies just as well to building a nation. And the decay I see - the resentment at doing needed maintenance, the unwillingness to create the conditions that make a place worth coming to - I get why people liked the slogan to "Make America Great Again" because we sure can see the slow rot settling in. I just wish they looked for a candidate that was actually interested in doing such a thing, instead of believing the words of someone who clearly doesn't.

But I'm getting away from the quote that started this:

"The road. The water. The shelter. The welcome. These were the conditions. The people are what the conditions produced. You cannot make people come. You can make the place worth coming to. 

"And when the place is worth coming to," James said, "it makes itself." 

"Not without maintenance," the elemental said, with the precision of something that understood what happened to springs that were not tended. " The conditions require attention. The welcome requires renewal. A place that stops being made is a place that starts to be unmade."

James thought about the list on his wall. About the road and the cistern and the market day proposal under the rock on his table. About Ren walking the perimeter twice daily and Eletha tracking the game population through the winter and Herbert with his accounting of iron stock and Bogrog with his bark-mark system keeping the agricultural record. 

About Caroline keeping rooms ready. 

"The maintenance is the work," James said.

 "The maintenance is the love,"  the elemental said, with the specificity of something that meant the word precisely.  "You do not maintain what you do not love. What you love, you maintain without being asked."

Yep

I keep wondering when people will get tired of all the lies and insanity.

https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2026/07/new-frontiers-in-sanewashing

I generally believe that "you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all the people all the time" but...

It sure is taking people a long time to wise up.

Always Rewriting History

https://www.thebulwark.com/p/why-stone-faced-fascists-keep-getting-antiquity-wrong-x-twitter-elon-musk-ancient-greece-roman-empire