I think my issue/concern about using the suffering of the world to empower your martial arts and become 'the nails that scratch the world' is that it doesn't truly lead to systemic change.
It's people fighting to be king of the hill. Or, as I discussed in previous posts, it's like the caterpillar pillar in Hope For the Flowers.
They are determining who wins by who defeats the other in martial arts, so it's pretty much 'might makes right'... and if a better martial artist appears on the other side they may fight this battle again, and the results will change.
All success in the battle to be king of the hill is temporary.
One person might be lucky enough to win it and keep the position until they die, but then the chances of their successor or their successor's successor doing the same is - not good.
Systemic change is... different.
For example, take terrorism.
I absolutely hate terrorism. I hate the suffering it causes, the sickening way they justify their violence, the way they deliberately target the innocent and vulnerable...
But in order to defeat terrorism, I don't want to kill every terrorist.
To me, it's far more important to defeat the idea of terrorism as a viable strategy.
That is, if there's a group that wants to make some sort of change to happen and they're trying to figure out how to do so, I want anyone who suggests bombing a market or targeting civilians to get instantly shouting down as a fool or a moron.
I want it glaringly obvious that such tactics are foolish and dumb and won't achieve anything worthwhile.
And that means I want a complicated strategy that involves whittling away at their support (whether by welcoming former terrorists who are trying to turn over a new leaf, or other such methods), preventing them from gaining supporters by making sure we don't act so badly that neutral parties start joining their side, and at the same time maintaining constant pressure and yes - lethal force - against the hardcore extremists who refuse to change course.
Basically, anyone who thinks attacking civilian targets is a good idea needs neutralized.
By the same token, if you want to end suffering the goal shouldn't be to guillotine all the wealthy 1%-ers (or in modern terms, to 'eat the rich').
It might come to that, sure... but it would just mean changing who's at the top, and in a few generations the exact same problems will appear.
Instead, I want it glaringly obvious that anyone trying to build a system that creates and then ignores human suffering is like building a house on sand.
Your foundations are weak, and the house will never last.
The issue is not actually that some people have a ton of money. It's that they have a ton of money - because of a system that has failed to pay wages in keeping with inflation (which basically means workers have received a wage cut for decades. It just doesn't feel like it because nobody actually change the dollar amount they were getting.)
I want a system like this to be considered as foolish as the mercantilism Adam Smith took aim at.
That companies and top investors hoarding money just means they're all fighting each other for larger shares of the same pie, whereas if they truly want the economy (and more money that comes from having a slice of a larger pie) then they would care about making sure the lower socioeconomic classes had money to spend.
That not all of their wages were tied up in paying for room and board. (Seriously. This isn't magic, nor mysterious in the slightest. Just think about stimulus checks. The more discretionary spending the majority of people have, the more likely they can afford to buy unnecessary things that appeal to them... which means there's more of a market for whatever business idea you can come up with. Oh, and I have to wonder how many more people would maintain multiple news subscriptions or multiple streaming video options if they didn't feel limited on how much they could afford. In the current economy, nobody is going to be paying for Netflix + Amazon Prime + HBO Max + Disney Plus + you get the idea. Each of those have to compete with each other for subscribers, because most people don't have the extra money to pay for more than one or two. Unless they're such a fanatic about it that they're willing to sacrifice other things.)
I also want it to be glaringly obvious that having a system where many people can't afford healthcare is foolish in the extreme. Not just for the loss of life from people who can't afford simple treatments like insulin...
But loss of work hours because people put off treatment as long as possible, so what might have been a couple of missed days if they'd been diagnosed and treated early instead becomes weeks or months of absence.
Etc, etc.
Basically, I want it to be considered good business sense to have systems that empower and enable people rather than exploit and ignore them.
And that only particularly foolish and incompetent business owners would try to use sweatshops or factories that externalize the costs to the environment.
We don't need a 'race to the bottom', and the companies driving that race deserve to be ridiculed and penalized. (They haven't discovered some great new strategy... they've sacrificed their morals in a way that other companies refused to.)
Anyways... I've rambled on enough about what I'd like to see. There's hints of actual studies supporting all of that, so I don't think it's completely unrealistic... but it'll definitely be an uphill battle.
To draw this back to 'the nails that scratch the world', and the fight between the righteous and demonic martial arts sects...
It's not really enough. (If there's any truth to the idea that fear of Malcolm X is part of why Martin Luther King Jr. was able to accomplish as much as he did, I suppose there's a use for something that reminds the powers-that-be that they can lose it all if they ignore too much suffering... but just having a counter-reaction doesn't change the system itself.)
I wanted to blog a bit and sort out some thoughts on something that came up in the latest fiction story I read.
I basically still adore Trash of the Count's Family, but alas I have caught up with everything that has been translated so far. So I went looking for stories that were similar...
I had heard about SSS-Class Suicide Hunter from a couple of places, but when I checked it out the main character seemed kind of meh.
One of my friends convinced me to give it another go, and I've been enjoying it.
As usual, here's a spoiler warning. Don't read if you don't want spoilers.
The story has some themes I'm coming to realize are fairly common for novels like this. There's almost a video game element (a dungeon or tower where people fight monsters. Some sort of system that classifies their level and gives them skills, etc).
In this case there's a tower they're trying to climb (those attempting to do so are called Hunters) and each level of the tower has some new quest or challenge.
Our main character is a nobody, and he idolizes the top ranked Hunter...
Until he stumbles across his idol murdering another Hunter, gets caught by his idol and murdered in turn.
Okay, if he got murdered how does he become the main character?
That gets into some of the Tower skills and other such shenanigans. Our main character, Kim Gongja, got an ability that allowed him to copy a skill from whoever killed him.
Which isn't very useful considering he died, except when the person who murdered you has the ability to regress 24hrs every time he dies.
In other words, the murderous Hunter who killed him had a cheat skill that acted like a save point in a video game. Every time he died, he would go back to 24 hours before his death... and now Kim Gongja had that skill as well.
Watching Kim Gongja's character grow over time is a real treat, especially seeing how he uses his abilities to clear the floors.
Because he doesn't just do the bare minimum it takes to clear it. He finds solutions that are... so much more emotionally satisfying than they have to be, to be honest.
Anyways, for one of the stages they had to help find a satisfactory ending to a story that would have ended painfully.
That is, a martial arts world was in the middle of a war between the righteous sects and demonic sects ('demonic' doesn't have our christian connotations, and I'm still getting a sense of what that difference means) when a zombie plague appeared. Rather than any sort of satisfying conclusion to their fight, all but two of the martial artists had succumbed to the plague and were now zombies.
I suppose that's enough to get on with this? Hmmm.... no, let me add a little more background.
After starting with The Untamed, watching other shows like Word of Honor, and reading the novels these were based off (as well as others like Devil Venerable Also Wants to Know), I've learned a bit more about the tropes and expectations for stories like this.
Apparently Word of Honor is a wuxia based story... as this article explains it:
Wuxia – translates at martial heroes. Long, long history of writing in China. Generally, martial artists with their powers boosted to supernatural realms.
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon is a wuxia story. They can be a lot of fun, and I'm not entirely sure to what degree their skills are exaggerated. Despite their seemingly impossible feats, though, they're all supposed to come from their martial arts.
Xianxia, on the other hand, is a bit more fantastical.
Xianxia – is a type of Chinese martial arts novel genre developed from the wuxia genre that is heavily influenced by Daoism and Buddhism (definition taken from Wikipedia). Basically, I translate it for others as Eastern Fantasy. Take wuxia martial artists and add fantasy elements. Anything with gods, spirits, demons, etc becomes xianxia.
Untamed is xianxia, as is Devil Venerable. One of the most common themes seems to be this notion of righteous sects versus demonic sects.
While I haven't read enough of them to claim any real experties, some of the themes I've noticed tend to be:
Righteous sects claim to be good, but often are hypocritical. Too many focus on the outward appearance of righteousness and cover up the bad things they do.
Demonic sects tend to be 'might makes right' where whoever is the top badass rules, and naturally expects all their subordinates to do their best to kill him/her. On the one hand that doesn't seem like a very comfortable position to be in, and if someone truly terrible is in charge the demonic sects can be truly terrible as well.
On the other hand there is a level of honesty to their behavior that you don't see in the righteous sects. The members of the demonic sects freely admit their intent to do whatever they want. And can it really be called betrayal if you expect your subordinates to do so any time they think they can get away with it?
Different stories do seem to portray each of these differently, so I'll try not to make any more sweeping generalizations. Anyways, on to SSS-Class Suicide Hunter.
This level is more like a wuxia novel. There are righteous martial artists and demonic martial artists, and they were fighting each other to determine which would control the martial arts world.
The only two fighters who have not turned into zombies are the 'Heavenly Demon' who unified and led the demonic sects, and the leader of the righteous sects.
When you first meet them, they seem... kind of pathetic, actually. The world is overrun with zombies, all their people are dead... and yet they still fight each other? Every day?
They talk about how they have 500 elite martial artists with them, and you discover they're talking about the zombies (and btw, how terrifying is it to have zombies that still can use their wuxia martial arts skills? Flying zombies... yikes.)
You later learn that both have been bitten already, and in order to slow down the spread they're using their skills to block the flow of energy... so they're not able to fight properly.
Even though they're the most skilled martial artists on their side, they're reduced to fighting with twigs and moves that look like a childish spat.
And you have to wonder - what's the point? Why keep doing this, when everyone is dead already? Especially since these two had been fighting each other like this for years, to the point where they almost seem more friends than enemies.
We see a flashback at some point, where we learn that the Heavenly Demon's subordinates urged her to give up the fight. To take their people and flee to some island.
Obviously she refused, and we can assume her opponent was offered and rejected a similar proposal.
It seems ludicrous at first.
The two most powerful martial artists of their time, fighting each other with twigs while the world ends.
However...
The Heavenly Demon explains some of it...
That as martial artists they all know and expect to die some day.
That the issue is not dying, nor fear of dying.
The issue is that they want a meaningful death.
Fighting to prove their martial arts are superior is meaningful. Giving your all, and losing... would still be meaningful.
Even getting poisoned is a meaningful death (I assume because it's seen as one of the weapons in the martial arts world.)
Getting bitten by a zombie and turning into one? Isn't...
I'm sure both sides supported trying to find a cure for the zombie plague. We learn about at least some of the attempts, as the story progresses.
They clearly failed.
And as for running away to an island to preserve some form of life... these are martial artists. Not the leaders of cities or nations. I don't think they have quite the same obligation to try to save humanity.
And so they pretend the 500 zombies (each) that they gather up whenever the light stops them from moving are still part of their forces. Pretend that they're not weak from preventing the zombie plague from spreading in their own bodies. Pretend that they're really using their weapons instead of twigs...
And keep challenging each other to duel, as much as possible given their limitations, in hopes of finding a more meaningful ending. (What's that about John 12:25? 'Anyone who loves their life will lose it, while anyone who hates their life in this world will keep it for eternal life.' )
Our main character does his thing, by which I mean that he goes above and beyond in order to try to find a more satisfying conclusion.
And one of the things he decides to try is to become the Heavenly Demon's disciple.
Basically, if her teachings are passed on to him then it isn't truly the end. (Especially when one of the Hunters that came with him becomes the student of the righteous sect leader... so the teachings are passed down to both of them and they can continue the battle.)
And this gets at the heart of why I decided to blog all this out.
A completely different martial artist master was educating our main character on some of the differences between the righteous and demonic martial arts:
-In the end, it’s a matter of how you deal with the world, whether it’s with strength or strategy.
‘How I deal with the world?’
-Indeed. If you try to embrace the world with generosity, you usually end up in the Righteous Sect. If you try to ravage the world, that is the Demonic Cult. That is why the people of the Righteous Sect made their bodies into [vessels to accept the world], and the Demonic Cult’s people made their bodies with [nails that can scratch the world]…
Bae Hu-ryeong hmphed and crossed his arms.
-I’ll give you the simplest example. A sword strike that cuts straight from the head to the bottom. In some schools, they call that the Tiger Fury because it is like [a tiger rushing].
Hwik!
Bae Hu-ryeong took a stance and swung his arms down as if he was wielding a sword with both hands.
‘······!’
It was only for an instant, but I flinched. I really felt the spirit of a wild beast charging at me.
It was strong.
...
-Well, it doesn’t really matter whether it’s a tiger or a bull. The specifics can vary depending on how the founder or the creator of the move gained enlightenment. Anyway, it’s important to [imitate] a tiger or bull.
Emulate it. Copy it.
Thus, you make something of the world into your own.
That’s what Bae Hu-ryeong meant by vessels to [accept the world.]
-But the demonic arts are different.
Bae Hu-ryeong took a stance again.
It was the same posture as when he previously swung his arms.
-In the Demonic Sect, they say something like this when teaching initiates.
Bae Hu-ryeong breathed in forcefully and stomped his foot.
-Recall your rage, the soreness in your stomach, at the moment a thief stole one of yours.
The empty air in the void split open.
I unintentionally stepped back.
The face.
It was because of Bae Hu-ryeong’s countenance.
His face was blank, but it still emanated an infinitely cold anger.
It was as if he became a completely different person.
-Recall the moment your younger sister was dragged away by the governor. Remember your weakness, your inability to do anything. You waited in front of the governor’s house for the night to pass, but at dawn, your sister returned to you as a cold carcass. Remember her face, and paint it into your heart.
Bae Hu-ryeong began to perform a sword dance.
Even though his hands were empty, somehow I felt as if I could still see a sword. That sword was as black as the space in which we stood.
-Recall when you buried your sister’s body, alone. Was it winter? The ground was frozen and it was hard to dig. Did you dig at the stubborn soil with your fingertips? Did your fingernails crack? Did blood flow from your broken nails?
‘······.’
-In the end, you couldn’t even dig down to a foot. Did you put your sister’s corpse into a pit? Did you bury her feet first? Did you put a pile of cold dirt over your younger sister’s body? You couldn’t bury her in the ground. In the end, did you sprinkle the dirt on her face, one handful at a time?
I couldn’t breathe.
As Bae Hu-ryeong’s sword dance continued, the endless space which we were in seemed to narrow. It was enough to make my head spin a little. It was only the movement of his hands and arms, but Bae Hu-ryeong’s grudge resonated deeply.
-Recall the texture of that grain of soil. Hold your sword with the hand that dug the earth. Swing your sword as you scattered the dirt over your younger sister. Lament your helplessness and blame the cruelty of the world.
I muttered, though it was more like a moan.
‘The nails that scratch the world…’
Turn all the pain and misery in the world into a martial art that can change the world. Nails that can scratch, a scream that can pierce...
Take all that suffering and use it to grow stronger. To make sure that the rich and powerful, the righteous sects... nobody can ignore those who suffer.
On the one hand, if I were to study a martial art I think I'm more inclined to the righteous sect.
On the other hand, I have seen how frustrating it is when the people in charge seem immune to the suffering of others.
They don't want to hear it, don't want to see it... they will use the police to push out homeless people rather than address the root causes of homelessness, and thus people suffer even more.
They will complain when someone interrupts their dinner, talk about 'bad form' or how impolite it is to take a knee at a football game, or yell at a politician right after some butthurt killer murders a bunch of children...
And yet if you stay 'polite', if you just vote and maybe do a protest march or two... they will just ignore everything. Ignore the suffering their decisions enable.
Oh yes... I see the appeal of being the nails that scratch the world.
And yet, that doesn't seem quite the right answer either.
Aren't the murderers shooting up schools also being 'nails that scratch the world'? Letting out their rage and hatred (I personally think it's unjustified, ofc, but I recognize it's rage and hatred nonetheless) on the world?
Is that not, ultimately, what quite a few terrorists are trying to be?
Perhaps, maybe, it can make some of these insulated and smug fools suffer.
I want to ponder this a bit more, but I've been typing for a while and this seems like a good stopping point.
I'll continue it later.
The news is all about the latest mass shooting (Uvalde, which I feel I have to specify because there have just been too damn many of them)
This one sounds particularly horrific, because the story keeps changing but whatever the truth is, it's apparent the police flubbed.
Terribly.
That's all about all I'll say for now though, still waiting for more verified details to come out.
Every year we see the same teams compete in major sports franchises. We have Major League Baseball, we have the Superbowl, we have March Madness and basketball...
And if you could just win once and be done, why would we bother playing again. And again. And again?
You all know why... same as I do.
Each game is different. Maybe the players have changed, or maybe the teams have practiced hard to make up for weaknesses the year before. Maybe someone else has the home court advantage. Maybe it's snowing this time, or raining. Someone might be injured, or sick. Or (I don't think they do this as often in professional sports) one team is still exhausted from an earlier game.
It might be different. The team that won last time might not win it this time.
If winning or losing was done once and only once, we'd never bother training up to beat someone who'd defeated us before.
So to bring this to 'survival of the fittest'... fittest at what? And when?
It's clearly not just about fittest fighter, or we'd all be ruled by MMA champions.
Perhaps it's 'fittest at getting a group of people to cooperate', since even the most powerful individual will get worn down and lose if multiple people work together against them. (Hence the power of a 'pack of wolves').
Is there some bar? A threshold beyond which someone is designated as 'fit enough to survive'? And anyone under that bar deserves to die?
That goes against... well, practically all of civilization. It goes against our Declaration of Independence, which declared that
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
I always believed that 'man' in this case was generic for all of humanity, and intended to be gender neutral. It definitely is race neutral, though it's worth emphasize that all people - men, women, non-binary, any race, any sexual orientation, people who are disabled, and pretty much anyone that is alive in the world today is endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.
And that the very first one of these is the right to LIFE.
Most religions also talk about the sanctity of life, though the Catholic church I was raised in claimed that being pro-life meant they also had to oppose the death penalty, and be consistent. (If I am pro-choice, it's mostly because a) there are far too many circumstances where abortion might be the best option, and I don't want and most especially don't want the government trying to dictate what the right decision should be. Especially when they don't seem to understand ectopic pregnancies, or that mothers may die because of government bungling. But also b) the people who claim to care so much about unborn children don't seem to care at all about helping with the childcare, or education, or food, or other expenses involved in raising them. They often also oppose contraception, and whether it's deliberate or not they essentially create a world where they expect people to just... not have sex. And if they do have sex and get pregnant, well, that's on them. Never mind that it's an inconsistent punishment that often hurts the woman far more than the man. I could go on, but this isn't actually about why I'm pro-choice, even if I personally don't think I'd ever choose an abortion for myself.)
Religions, so far as I can tell, are opposed to the idea that only certain people are allowed or 'should' survive.
Even fictional authors make some great points on this topic, especially JRR Tolkien... who had Gandalf say:
“Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends.”
And also had the ring destroyed because Frodo stayed his hand and allowed Gollum to live.
But let's leave aside our own Declaration of Independence, all the teachings of the Bible and christianity (and other religions), the wise saying of JRR Tolkien, and more...
Let's just say that who is 'fittest' is an arbitrary judgement that doesn't make sense without context. Furthermore, who is 'fittest' can and does change. Hourly. Daily. Throughout our lives.
People can temporarily get sick, and still recover. Or train up to get stronger, or age and get weaker. Covid might especially hurt the 'weak', except that the 'weak' might be someone who is temporarily immuno-compromised... and if covid hadn't hit, they'd have gotten better and still lived a long and full life.
Or it's someone with diabetes, who could live a very long time so long as they get their regular insulin shots. It's managed, and not life threatening at all.
But that's all besides the point, because why should they deserve to die just because they have diabetes? Or are going through chemotherapy?
Or are overweight?
How on earth does that make it okay to ignore their deaths?
A quadraplegic still deserves life. As does anyone with a mental illness, or any other disability.
What I don't get is how the same people who made a big fuss over Terri Schiavo, who claim to be 'pro-life', who claim to love Jesus and the Bible...
Shrug at the million people who have died of covid. Pretend it's 'an act of god' or something, actively fight against the measures meant to help our friends and neighbors survive, act as though wearing a cloth mask or funding ventilation for major buildings is a huge imposition... and don't seem to care at all about what that does to the most vulnerable among us.
It's sickening, and infuriating.
And not all of that is because of mistaken ideas about 'survival of the fittest', but I definitely come across people who think that way. Who say "I got it, and my family got it, and we're all fine", who cares about the rest. Covid is just taking out those with underlying conditions, or the elderly. People who were going to die anyway.
Yes, and in another ten or twenty or thirty years you're going to be one of those elderly people. Should you just lay down and die, then? Do you have no value at that point?
What determines your value, anyway? Do you think it's the job you have, or the money you make?
Do you think the grandchild who looks up to and learns from their grandmother or grandfather thinks that they have no value simply because they're old?
Whatever. Foolish ideas lead to foolish behavior, and if we've learned nothing else since covid hit it's that we're apparently full of foolish ideas.
Powered up the computer for something else, and figured while I was on it I'd knock out a longer post.
Except I don't really have anything in mind. Guess I'll just start with where I'm at right now...
Work has been busy. We've had some turnover, so now I'm suddenly one of the more experienced members of our team - and am helping train the new arrivals.
That's been... interesting. It was only a few years ago that I was in their shoes, and I remember how much of a struggle it was to learn what I needed to learn. And yet now that I'm on the other side, I also see how hard it is to try to teach them.
It's not teaching in general that's the problem. I like to think I'm somewhat decent at that.
It's that the things we do are complicated, and require a background in a variety of technologies.
You don't have to be an expert in all of them, but you have to know how to look things up. You also have to know how to make educated guesses about what the error messages are telling you, and have a decent enough grasp of the technology to know where you should look.
I don't think I'm explaining that very well...
Just the other day the offshore team passed along an issue during our handover meeting. There was a problem with some of the containers, and they thought it was related to something else. Which sort of made sense based on the error they found.
However, if the problem was where they thought it was we would have seen the same problem affecting other environments. That technology was used for all of them, and should have impacted them all the same way.
That wasn't the case.
Our team lead helped identify the problem, some parameters were configured wrong (to a machine that had been decommissioned over a year ago, which raises the question 'why did we only see this problem now?') and we were able to fix the issue...
But you have to know enough to know that we'd been looking in the wrong spot.
On any given day I don't really know what I'll be working with... which I kind of like, tbh. I like the variety and I like the puzzle solving aspect. But on any given day I might need to understand how the operating system works, how networking works, how to read a script, how to manage ssh keys, how to work with git, how to work with databases, how automated tools work, and more. Maybe not as a full-fledged expert, but enough to know what to search for or who to reach out to.
I've realized that giving some training (with a powerpoint that has screenshots and commands used) isn't necessarily enough. The trainee has to take that information and try doing it themselves. Make it their own.
I don't want to make it any harder than it has to be, but I also feel like (so long as something isn't a priority) letting them flail around a bit while trying to resolve an issue is part of the learning process. There are things they don't really grasp until they run into it themselves.
Like, I've learned to always make sure I've got the latest version if I'm modifying some files maintained by some form of version control. Or to take a backup if I'm modifying something that isn't. (Well, take a backup regardless. Makes it so much easier to revert a change if you need to.)
I can say that, and demonstrate that, but when it comes time to do it themselves they tend to forget. Until you suddenly have a merge conflict or need to revert something and don't remember what was in the original.
Anyways, I didn't plan on writing so much about work. I didn't really plan on writing much of anything, but I think I'll move on.
I watched Everything Everywhere All At Once, one of the rare times I actually went to see a movie in theater. My brother mentioned it when we were deciding what to watch a couple weeks ago, and even though that wasn't the movie we decided on it looked interesting enough that I decided to check it out.
It is pretty awesome, I highly recommend it. It especially felt like a great counter to the nihilism that seems so everpresent today.
There just seems to be so much wrong with the world... and too few people working to actually fix it. (Instead, we get story after story of some wealthy fool actively making things worse. What is it about extreme wealth that makes people so messed up? And why do all the rest of us have to suffer because of their poor decisions?)
I'm rather sick of talking about that though... the ones who need to hear it won't, and the rest of us know it all too well.
On a related note, it's still very disturbing to realize how badly our news agencies are doing at keeping us informed about important topics.
For example - India/Pakistan is having a crazy heat wave, temperatures above 120F. Some guy set himself on fire in protest because of climate change. And scientists have issued yet another warning that something needs done, and quick, or we face real consequences.
But it hardly makes a blip in the news. The powers-that-be seem to have decided that doing nothing is the best answer. Much like they've done with other hot topics...
and the crappy part is that they aren't the ones who will suffer the consequences. (The older ones may even successfully pass on without seeing any consequences at all. The younger ones may manage to avoid them... for a time. You'd think if they were serious about long term thinking they'd understand that a system has to benefit everyone. Any system that 'works' while making some sub-class miserable is not a system worth supporting. Not in a 'you have to give them what they want' kind of way, but in the same way a family negotiates where they're going out to eat. Uh... at least, my experience of such a thing. I suppose there are some families that don't listen to or care about what some of the members want, but they sound like pretty crappy families too.)
All right, that's enough for the night. I'm also worried about whatever the heck Russia is planning for May 9th (my thoughts go out to the Ukrainians suffering under their invasion).
And also concerned that so much of the news about January 6th barely seems to get the attention it deserves. (The Ginny Thomas stuff has pretty much disappeared now... )
I hope that's just because the wheels of justice are turning slowly, because if nothing is done it sets a very dangerous precedent, and I fear for our future.
