I rather liked my painting analogy - it helps explain what I mean when I say that an idea is floating around in the back of my mind, but that it hasn't come together to the point where I can write it.
The problem is that I will play around with the idea in my head and follow it through to a certain extent - and then realize that I'm focusing too much on one part of the whole. Like going into great detail about the way a fish is painted, and never discussing the reflected trees.
I could talk about a book I read - about the Carolingians. The descendents of Charlemagne, and in particular the fighting between his grandsons. How they exemplify the differences between the average person and people in power. How all their petty squabbling with each other meant that they put multiple armies in the field - armies that generally had to live off the land, and therefore were a plague on the local populace - and despite all the violence and suffering never really got anywhere with it.
How their pride prevented them from doing as Jesus said, and being 'good shepherds' to their people.
But pretty soon I feel like I'm just rehashing things I've said before, and I don't think anything I say is going to convince people like that 'take care of your people' is something they should take seriously.
And that's not really worth discussing yet again.
No, I think the issue is that if you want to have lions lay down with the lambs, you have to discuss the lions.
It's tempting to say 'just get rid of the lions and everything would be great'. We even have the story of the baboons who grew more peaceful after the most aggressive baboons died out en masse.
But we're not really two separate species, people have the potential to be both. Get rid of the 'lions', and it probably won't be long before people like that start appearing again.
Besides, I don't think they're evil in and of themselves. God probably even admires them, kind of like we do.
See how sharp their claws are. Hear those fierce roars. See the way their muscles flow as they move.
For a lion to lay down with a lamb, you probably need the lion to... not be hungry, not feel the need to prey on the lamb... and probably get enrichment in other ways so they don't have the desire to stalk or pounce or hunt the lamb.
If you had asked me before, I'd have said that's part of what was great about democracy. That even the more predatory of our species knew that in order to get what they wanted, they had to play be certain rules that protected the rest of us.
Does it matter if they're power hungry and prideful if the only way to gain power is to at least pretend to care?
It doesn't feel like that anymore, though.
Clearly 'be a good shepherd' and 'the first will be last, and the last will be first' are ideas that the current predatory lions don't believe in.
Hmmmm. The ideas floating around there still feel off, but to be honest I'm more concerned with preparing for my next potential career change than digging into it any deeper.
Too bad I can't just make a living throwing out random blog posts.